SpectraDxClinical Workflow Platform
The software layer between
spectrometers and clinicians
Instrument control, patient workflow, ML classification, HL7/FHIR output, and billing automation—across FTIR, Raman, and NIR. One platform replaces six months of custom development.
The Gap
Instrument vendors build acquisition software.
Nobody builds clinical workflow software.
Every spectrometer ships with vendor software for data acquisition and analysis. But the layer clinicians actually need—patient context, workflow orchestration, ML classification, HL7/FHIR messaging, billing—doesn't exist. Labs building spectroscopy-based diagnostics are forced into custom development at $250–500K+ and 6–12 months of lead time.
FTIR
Bruker OPUS
Acquisition & analysis only
FTIR / Raman
Thermo Fisher OMNIC
Acquisition & analysis only
Raman
Horiba LabSpec
Acquisition & analysis only
Raman
Renishaw WiRE
Acquisition & analysis only
Traditional consulting firms quote $250–500K and 6–12 months to build custom workflow software—for a single instrument, at a single site.
What We Build
Platform capabilities
Six integrated modules that turn any spectrometer into a deployable clinical diagnostic device.
Clinician UI
Web app designed for medical staff, not spectroscopy experts. Enter patient MRN, run test, view result. No spectrometer training required.
Instrument Control
Python/FastAPI backend controls instruments via vendor APIs — Bruker DDE, Horiba SDK, Thermo OMNIC. Staff never touches instrument software.
ML Model Integration
Pluggable interface for your classification models. SVM, random forest, neural net, CNN — bring your trained model, we handle the pipeline.
HL7/FHIR Output
Generates ORU^R01 messages for Epic, Oracle Health, and Athena. FHIR R4 DiagnosticReport for modern integrations.
Billing Automation
CPT code assignment, payer routing, and volume reporting. Every billable event logged and routed automatically.
Multi-Site Data
Cloud sync of spectral data, results, and metadata across locations. Centralized analytics for multi-site operations.
Multi-Modal
Works across every spectroscopy modality
The instrument adapter changes. The clinician workflow, HL7 output, billing, and data layer stay the same.
FTIR
Fourier-Transform Infrared
Infrared absorption — chemical fingerprinting of biological samples
Key Instruments
Clinical Applications
- ›Bacterial identification
- ›Antimicrobial susceptibility
- ›Tissue pathology
- ›Biofluids analysis
Raman
Raman Spectroscopy
Inelastic light scattering — molecular structure analysis without sample preparation
Key Instruments
Clinical Applications
- ›Intraoperative margin assessment
- ›Drug identification
- ›Point-of-care pathogen detection
- ›Surgical guidance
NIR
Near-Infrared
Near-infrared absorption — non-invasive tissue and blood component measurement
Key Instruments
Clinical Applications
- ›Blood glucose monitoring
- ›Tissue oxygenation
- ›Pharmaceutical QC
- ›Raw material identification
Build vs. Buy
Why not build in-house?
Diagnostic startups think about building their own clinical workflow software. Here's why they stop.
Your scientists shouldn’t be writing HL7 parsers
Every month your team spends on software infrastructure is a month not spent on the science and FDA submission that actually matters.
Instrument integration is a rabbit hole
Bruker’s DDE protocol, Horiba’s SDK, Thermo’s OMNIC API — all poorly documented, all full of edge cases. We’ve already gone down every one.
IEC 62304 documentation transfers to your FDA submission
If the software is part of your device, the lifecycle documentation we maintain becomes part of your regulatory package. Building it yourself means documenting it yourself.
Multi-site from day one
You’ll want multiple pilot sites. Multi-site data sync, method deployment, and centralized analytics are already built — not bolted on later.
Switch modalities without rebuilding
Evaluating FTIR vs. Raman for your test? SpectraDx supports both. Add a second modality or change instruments without rewriting a line of workflow code.
Platform vs. custom development
What takes a traditional consulting firm 6–12 months and $250–500K, SpectraDx deploys in weeks.
How It Works
From assessment to deployment in weeks
Technical Assessment
We evaluate your instrument, workflow requirements, ML model, and EMR integration needs. You get a deployment plan with zero ambiguity.
Platform Configuration
Instrument adapter development, clinician UI customization, HL7/FHIR field mapping, and billing configuration. Built against your exact environment.
On-Site Deployment
Physical instrument integration, network configuration, staff training, and go-live. First patient test through the platform before we leave.
Ongoing Operation
Platform updates, technical support, performance monitoring, and multi-site expansion as you grow. New instruments get adapter plugins, not rebuilds.
Built for regulated environments
Every deployment includes audit-ready documentation. Our IEC 62304 lifecycle artifacts transfer directly to your FDA submission.
21 CFR Part 11
Electronic records & signatures
HIPAA
Protected health information
IEC 62304
Medical device software lifecycle
HL7v2
ORU^R01 messaging standard
FHIR R4
DiagnosticReport resources
ISO 13485
Quality management systems
Ready to deploy spectroscopy-based
diagnostics?
Tell us about your instrument, your test, and your timeline. We'll show you exactly how the platform fits.